Re: yum vs apt,

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2006-06-26 at 20:19 +0100, Jonathan Underwood wrote:
> So it seems it's not just local to Jaroslaw, and is probably a bug.
> This is on a FC-5 box only ever updated with yum. /var/yum.log[.n]
> shows that docbook hasn't been updated ever though, version:
> docbook-dtds-1.0-30 which I believe is the one from the install media.
> So, a problem with anaconda?
> 

Anaconda doesn't exactly care currently if you have unresolvable deps.
It will happily install.  So perhaps we screwed up the release wrt
broken deps and its just never been fixed.  I'd say file a bug against
docbook-dtds pointing out the broken dep.

-- 
Jesse Keating RHCE      (geek.j2solutions.net)
Fedora Legacy Team      (www.fedoralegacy.org)
GPG Public Key          (geek.j2solutions.net/jkeating.j2solutions.pub)

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux