> Two reasons: > > - What about QA? I'm fearing that the QA for the Extras packages > is not the same as for Core. Is that right, or...? At least > I've already seen Extras packages (don't remember which ones) > that seem of pretty poor quality (packaging-wise). I've got the opposite feeling. The Fedora Packaging guidelines are better followed in extras, because the packages have had to comply with them before core packages had to. Therefore fedora extras packages are most of the time of better quality. And those that aren't are either packages that had a free go in extras from core or packages submitted before the guidelines were achieved. (if you remeber which ones it would be helpfull, I guess ;-) > - The relation between FC and RHEL. I think there is officially > no relation, but I can't suppress the thoughts that there is one. > I've already seen good-old "nmh" being removed from FC and RHEL. Maybe at some point there would be rebuilt of extras packages for RHEL (there are allready for centos) even though this is not supported by redhat. -- Pat -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
