On Sun, 2006-06-25 at 21:38 +0200, Jos Vos wrote: > Is this (the "yet") a joke? Is it really considered an option to move > mutt to Extras? :-( And: what package would replace the functionality > of ImageMagick? It may not be perfect, but it is still needed. And > some time ago there was also a discussion about TeX and friends.. > > Please... let's keep the real UNIX power in Fedora Core and not only > focus on the GUI-tools (and I hope Red Hat will do the same for > RHEL). I'm continually baffled by the resistance to move things into Extras. As a user, why should it matter to you? When you run pup or pirut, can you really tell what comes from Extras and what comes from Core? As a developer, this would give you more access to help the development of said component. How can this be a bad thing? Once we get to the point where we spin ISO sets that are Core and Extras packages to complete a theme or goal (Fedora Desktop, Fedora Web Server, Fedora Development, etc..) then does it _really_ matter if its in Core or Extras? This is why I said "yet" as we need to get to where "shipped" isos have the content necessary for that goal of theme. Please, do let me know why there is resistance. -- Jesse Keating Release Engineer: Fedora
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
