Jesse Keating wrote: > On Sun, 2006-06-25 at 20:24 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: >> Ok, this leaves the question do any core packages use ImageMagick >> during >> build and which packages do? > > So according to my freshly ported repoquery, I get this: > > [jkeating@dhcp83-49 ~]$ ./repoquery --whatrequires --alldeps > --repoid=development --repoid=development-source ImageMagick > xfig-0:3.2.4-21.x86_64 > ImageMagick-perl-0:6.2.8.0-1.x86_64 > ImageMagick-0:6.2.8.0-1.i386 > ImageMagick-devel-0:6.2.8.0-1.i386 > ImageMagick-c++-0:6.2.8.0-1.x86_64 > ImageMagick-0:6.2.8.0-1.x86_64 > w3m-img-0:0.5.1-12.2.1.x86_64 > ImageMagick-devel-0:6.2.8.0-1.x86_64 > ImageMagick-c++-0:6.2.8.0-1.i386 > [jkeating@dhcp83-49 ~]$ ./repoquery --whatrequires --alldeps > --repoid=development --repoid=development-source ImageMagick-devel > ImageMagick-c++-devel-0:6.2.8.0-1.i386 > ImageMagick-c++-devel-0:6.2.8.0-1.x86_64 > [jkeating@dhcp83-49 ~]$ ./repoquery --whatrequires --alldeps > --repoid=development --repoid=development-source ImageMagick-c++-devel > [jkeating@dhcp83-49 ~]$ > > So it would appear that the only thing needing it to build is xfig and > w3m-img. However I'm not entirely sure repoquery is getting the srpms > that require it, I'm almost certain there are a few things that > BuildRequire: ImageMagick but they aren't getting picked up. > > w3m is needed by things like mutt, not sure if we want to move that to > Extras (yet) (: > Hmm, Going offtopic a bit but this going to be all about soft versus harddeps. Mutt does NOT require w3m, when you want to view html mail in mutt you need _A_ html2text filter / pager. So that Requirement might even be removed without breaking mutt, especially since most mailclients send both plaintext and html versions (or atleadt they used to). Also w3m-img does NOT need ImageMagick, it needs an image viewer to invoke, currently it uses "display" from ImageMagick for this by default. but this could be changed. I just tested to make sure and "display" does not work without X, so any simple X image viewer will do. IMHO gthumb for example would be better, for one because it has a much better UI then display. So if w3m-img is all thats stopping ImageMagick from moving from Core to Extras then that can be fixed. Don't get me wrong here I'm not saying that ImageMagick _must_ move, just that it might be a good idea. The amount of open bugs in bugzilla is absolutly mind boggling and it just seems a good idea to me to shift some packages to Extras where a (hopefully) growing community can pick them up and start fixing all those bugs. leaving core packagers with more time to fix bugs in their packages. As I've already tried to discuss in another thread another option would be to make it easier for the community to help fix core bugs. Regards, Hans -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list