mailinglists@xxxxxxxxxxxx (Erwin Rol) writes: > what would be the correct installation path for a cross-compiler and > it's support include files and libraries ? We are packaging the cross stuff in the following way: /usr/ |-- bin/ | |-- arm-xscale-linux-uclibc-ar -> ../arm-xscale-linux-uclibc/bin/ar | |-- arm-xscale-linux-uclibc-gcc -> ../arm-xscale-linux-uclibc/bin/gcc | ... ditto for the other devel tools ... | ... in fact, some 'alternative' magic is involved too ... | |-- arm-xscale-linux-uclibc | |-- bin/ | | `-- ... lot of host executable files ... | `-- sys-root/ | |-- bin/ | | |-- busybox | | ... lot of target binaries ... | |-- lib/ | |-- ld-uClibc-0.9.28.so | ... lot of target libraries ... |-- lib/ | |-- gcc/ | | |-- arm-xscale-linux-uclibc/ | | | |-- 4.1.1/ | | | | ... lot of gcc 4.1.1 target files ... | |-- libexec/ | |-- gcc/ | | |-- arm-xscale-linux-uclibc/ | | | |-- 4.1.1/ | | | | ... lot of gcc 4.1.1 host files ... /usr/$ARCH/sys-root is packaged relocatable but it is a good place for target libraries and include files because gcc/binutils are looking there for them. Enrico -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
