On Thu, 2006-06-22 at 10:47 +0200, Erwin Rol wrote: > On Thu, 2006-06-22 at 09:47 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > > On Thu, 2006-06-22 at 08:57 +0200, Erwin Rol wrote: > So the correct but not working solution is to use a --prefix=/usr and > the incorrect but working solution is to use > --prefix=/opt/crosstools/<target>/ ? :-) Working, in the sense of producing a functional toolchain are both. For --prefix=/usr you currently have to cope with a couple of minor functional regressions due to defects/bugs/oversights in GCC and (not yet having been mentioned) with quite an amount of bugs in rpm. For --prefix=/opt you will have to cope with even more bugs/deficits in rpm (RH's rpm does a poor job on packaging outside of /usr [1]). > So i guess I first get things as an RPM working in /opt and later worry > about putting it in the "correct" place . Installing to /opt or /opt/<whatever> (We use /opt/rtems or /opt/rtems-4.7 for the rtems.org packages) definitely is easier from a pure packaging point of view, and if ignoring the problems rpm has. Ralf [1] Last time, I checked SuSE's rpm had been doing slightly better. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
