On Thu, 2006-06-15 at 08:43 +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > Am Donnerstag, den 15.06.2006, 02:12 -0400 schrieb Dave Jones: > > On Thu, Jun 15, 2006 at 07:27:46AM +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > > > Am Mittwoch, den 14.06.2006, 17:59 +0200 schrieb Phil Knirsch: > > > > [...] > > > > This includes > > > > things like suspend/hibernate and resume, docking stations and > > > > powersaving just to name a few. > > > > [...] > > > This reminds me: Are there any plans to use s2ram in Fedora? > > If anywhere, that magic really belongs in HAL. > > The ubuntu folks seem to agree. > > That's okay for me. Are there any efforts in that direction already? > gnome-power-manager perhaps? Yeah, see the archives of the hal list over the past month or two. > BTW, managing whitelists and "lists with required workarounds for > certain laptops" really sounds like something to me that needs to be > handled somewhere "upstream" -- otherwise each distro would have to > manage its own lists and that wastes a lot of man-power without a real > benefit afaics... *nod* This is part of why pm-utils has moved to fdo and there's a list there. The nice thing about handling the quirking with HAL is that you can describe the quirks needed just with an FDI file. And in a utopian future, perhaps vendors will distribute FDI files for their hardware describing the quirks they need[1] Jeremy [1] Okay, clearly I'm sleep deprived from the freeze process ;-) -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
