Kernel timers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2006-06-14 at 23:33 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> Tickless operation. We need to abandon the timer tick.

Interesting, what would this mean for low latency operation?

It seems we in the Media Production SIG aren't going to be able to get
away with not using a 1000mhz kernel very easily, and I suppose now is a
good a time as any to bring it up with the core kernel people. See my
Rosegarden review request:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189322

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux