Bill Nottingham wrote: > Rex Dieter (rdieter@xxxxxxxxxxxx) said: >> Rex Dieter wrote: >> >> > Gilboa Davara wrote: >> >> >> What about the plan to push KDE into extra? has it been finalized yet? >> >> > The "plan" is simply a proposal, and certainly nothing has been >> > finalized. >> >> See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UnleashKDE >> >> > it's going to be a piecemeal process... e.g. qt4,kdetoys are (already) >> > in Extras. >> >> Speaking of which, IMO, here's a list of kde bits that are very >> Extras-worthy: >> kdeaddons >> kdeadmin >> kdeartwork (since xscreensaver -> Extras) >> kdebindings >> kdeedu >> kdegames >> kdeutils >> kdewebdev >> >> 2nd tier bits: >> kdegraphics >> kdemultimedia >> kdenetwork >> kdepim >> kdesdk >> kdevelop >> >> lastly, core/esential bits: >> kdebase >> kdelibs >> >> and if you're *really* wild: (doubt this will ever happen) >> qt(3.3.x) > > Are these all distinct dependency-wise? Mostly. Exceptions below: essential kde-pkg: BuildRequires --------------------- arts: qt-devel kdelibs: qt-devel arts-devel (*) Given for kde-3.x: Everything BuildRequires: kdelibs-devel kde-pkg BuildRequires(*) ------------------- kdeaddons: kdebase-devel kdegames-devel kdemultimedia-devel kdepim-devel kdeartwork: kdebase-devel kdesdk: kdepim-devel kdevelop: kdesdk-devel Core apps depending on kde (with BuildRequires): k3b: kdelibs-devel Am I missing anything? > How does it improve the value proposition to have bits in extras, > as opposed to the whole thing? None, I was just advocating an incremental move to ease the pain and suffering... (: -- Rex -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
