Re: UnleashKDE

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Rex Dieter (rdieter@xxxxxxxxxxxx) said: 
> Rex Dieter wrote:
> 
> > Gilboa Davara wrote:
> 
> >> What about the plan to push KDE into extra? has it been finalized yet?
> 
> > The "plan" is simply a proposal, and certainly nothing has been finalized.
> 
> See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UnleashKDE
> 
> > it's going to be a piecemeal process... e.g. qt4,kdetoys are (already) in
> > Extras.
> 
> Speaking of which, IMO, here's a list of kde bits that are very
> Extras-worthy:
> kdeaddons
> kdeadmin
> kdeartwork (since xscreensaver -> Extras)
> kdebindings
> kdeedu
> kdegames
> kdeutils
> kdewebdev
> 
> 2nd tier bits:
> kdegraphics
> kdemultimedia
> kdenetwork
> kdepim
> kdesdk
> kdevelop
> 
> lastly, core/esential bits:
> kdebase
> kdelibs
> 
> and if you're *really* wild: (doubt this will ever happen)
> qt(3.3.x)

Are these all distinct dependency-wise? How does it improve the
value proposition to have bits in extras, as opposed to the whole
thing?

Bill

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux