> On Tue, 2006-05-30 at 15:01 +0200, nodata wrote: >> > On Tue, 2006-05-30 at 08:47 -0400, Horst von Brand wrote: >> >> Michael Schwendt <fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > >> >> > As a user, being confronted with "just another feature-overloaded >> bug >> >> > tracker" which contains many new and poorly named and >> insufficiently >> >> > described "products" and "components" and hundreds of open bug >> >> reports, it >> >> > is a very frustrating experience to spend time on _trying_ to help >> by >> >> > reporting something upstream only to learn that the report is >> ignored >> >> or >> >> > closed as duplicate or closed as NOTOURBUG or not been looked at >> for >> >> > many months. >> >> >> >> Why not adopt some packages, and help out by keeping an eye on >> bugzilla >> >> for >> >> them, trying to reproduce bugs, and kick them upstream as needed? >> That >> >> way >> >> you don't have to learn about many upstream bug trackers, just a few. >> >> -- >> > >> > If anyone is interested in that, >> > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers >> > >> > Rahul >> >> Isn't this a workaround for bugzilla lacking an easy way to move bugs >> upstream? Wasn't the XML RPC interface meant to solve this? > > Upstream projects use different versions of bugzilla and various other > bug tracking systems. So if upstream uses bugzilla (like kernel and Gnome do), is this possible? > There isnt a universal method of doing it > automatically. In some cases XML RPC does help. > > Rahul So I guess this is being worked on? -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
