> On Tue, 2006-05-30 at 08:47 -0400, Horst von Brand wrote: >> Michael Schwendt <fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > As a user, being confronted with "just another feature-overloaded bug >> > tracker" which contains many new and poorly named and insufficiently >> > described "products" and "components" and hundreds of open bug >> reports, it >> > is a very frustrating experience to spend time on _trying_ to help by >> > reporting something upstream only to learn that the report is ignored >> or >> > closed as duplicate or closed as NOTOURBUG or not been looked at for >> > many months. >> >> Why not adopt some packages, and help out by keeping an eye on bugzilla >> for >> them, trying to reproduce bugs, and kick them upstream as needed? That >> way >> you don't have to learn about many upstream bug trackers, just a few. >> -- > > If anyone is interested in that, > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers > > Rahul Isn't this a workaround for bugzilla lacking an easy way to move bugs upstream? Wasn't the XML RPC interface meant to solve this? -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
