Re: Back to 6 month schedule?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2006-05-23 at 19:53 +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> But we are working on a distribution that is the base for an Enterprise
> distribution that ships every 18 month afaik. So a strict six months
> release schedule also a benefit for Red Hat afaics.
> 
> >  Some changes take
> > longer to implement than others.  Being tied down to a strict 3 year
> > plan (or longer) does not fit well with what we need.
> 
> Things can be changed if necessary. 
> 

So uh, which do you want?  A strict inflexible schedule, or a flexible
schedule where things can be changed if necessary?

-- 
Jesse Keating
Release Engineer: Fedora

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux