Re: Back to 6 month schedule?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Axel Thimm wrote:
Hi,

I just checked with the schedule for FC6 in the wiki. I thought FC was
targetting 9 months cycles, and FC6 looks like a 6 month cycle.

Just curious what the targeted general schedule is, what FC6's
concrete schedule is (e.g. if the general schedule is 9 month, why go
6 months for FC6?), and closely related to this, what the relationship
RHEL5 to FC5/FC6 will be.

My guess is that having an FC6 shortly before RHEL5 may be nice for
checking some post-FC5 items that will have made it into RHEL5 (for
instance xen and storage/cluster/gfs improvements). Is that the master
plan?

BTW in case it sounds like I would mind either way, I don't. ;)

Maybe this has been discussed here before, but then I missed it when
searching for "schedule" and "month" in subject lines.

I thought the 9 months for FC5 was always a one-off in order to get the necessary installer infrastructure work done, and the plan was always for 6-monthly releases in general.

Paul.

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux