On Tue, 2006-05-23 at 18:53 +0200, David Nielsen wrote: > Aren't you disregarding the fact that GNOME also has a release cycle > that enforces a strict bugfix only period, meaning the risk we face > having shipped every test release in Development of the famous baby > eating syndrome is incredibly low. But not low enough. There are parts of the gnome release that seem to not follow this. Large changes in the last tarball including FEATURE changes hit us with this last gnome release. Remember things that didn't make the release and were held out for later test updates. Even still it was a hellish couple of days for our gnome folks to chew through the 'minimal' changes. I was not comfortable at ALL with this process. > But it would still be nice to have plenty of time between the GNOME and > FC releases - It would give us the option to ship the follow up GNOME > 2.x.1/2 release which is normally better translated and has more bugs > fixed. So we move the problem from N to N+1 ? (; -- Jesse Keating Release Engineer: Fedora
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
