On Tue, 2006-05-23 at 07:54 -0400, seth vidal wrote: > > Not all of us involved. > > I quite liked the 9 month schedule. Open mouth, insert foot. I didn't mean to say all involved, that was supposed to be 'most' or even 'some'. In reality, it did NOT turn into 6 months of changes and 3 months of fixes, it turned into 8~9 months of changes and a couple hectic weeks of trying to fix crap. Hence the slips and the delays and whatnot. Maybe if we had been more draconic about development freezes and freezes in general it would have ended up different. But alas we weren't and thus we had a TON more changed crap at the end of it all to try and polish up and get out. Even if we did stop at 6 months, this would mean that for all intensive purposes we're releasing 3 month old software into our 'early adopters' community. That wouldn't fly much either (; -- Jesse Keating Release Engineer: Fedora
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
