On Tue, 2006-05-23 at 07:47 -0400, Jesse Keating wrote: > FC5's 9(10, 11) month schedule was an experiment in adjusting the > schedule to see if it helped in our release. While it did allow for > some larger changes to make it through, it multiplied the amount of > little changes at the same time. It created a very bad situation for > those of us trying to do any kind of QA on the distro before it went out > the door. For all those involved, we felt that the 9 month schedule > hurt more than it helped and we're back to the tried and true 6 month > schedule, with slips here and there (hopefully not). Not all of us involved. I quite liked the 9 month schedule. -sv -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
