On Sun, 2006-05-21 at 08:30 +0200, Florian La Roche wrote: > > right now I'm mostly concerned with the idea that in order to build for > > x86_64 we have to first have i686 built. > > > > That sort of works against all the assumptions we've been making for a > > while. > > > > So far I've not heard an explanation for it it has simply been asserted > > that it must be so. > > This is not true for most packages, only very few need to have > 32bit packages installed in the buildroot. > > We anyway build x86_64 and x86 packages on the same machine. > Seth, what is your concern here? That it feels wrong and klunky to have to have a working i686 distribution before we can have a working x86_64 distribution. I know it's not the goal of fedora but at some point I would hope we could just rid ourselves of i686 forever once x86_64 saturation is sufficiently complete. Anyway to fix the problem for the mock case in your mock.cfg make it look like this: [main] cachedir=/var/cache/yum debuglevel=1 reposdir=/dev/null logfile=/var/log/yum.log retries=20 obsoletes=1 gpgcheck=0 assumeyes=1 exclude=*.i386 *.486 *.586 *.i686 *.athlon includepkgs=glibc*.i686 *.x86_64 *.ia32e *.noarch that should allow for the specific packages you want. whomever is running against this error, please let me know if the above succeeds. thanks, -sv -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
