Dnia 05-04-2006, śro o godzinie 10:43 +0100, David Woodhouse napisał(a): > > I can't say I'm some kind of expert e-mail user, but Evo 2.6 seems to > > be working mostly OK here. > It seems broken to me -- your reply lacked a 'References:' or > 'In-Reply-To:' header, and thus was detached from the thread because it > didn't indicate which message it was a response to. User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) H3 (4.1) Evolution 2.6 doesn't have a problem there. It doesn't have that many problems at all - it's just it's not enough actively maintained and bugs (probably simple, sometimes with patches available in many bugzillas at once) aren't fixed. Evolution is a good mailer, only the changes are in wrong direction [adding new untested features instead of fixing recently added (and proved to be buggy) untested features :)]. Lam
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: To jest =?iso-8859-2?Q?cz=EA=B6=E6?= listu podpisana cyfrowo
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
