Re: Why Elektra is the wrong approach (Was Re: The Strengths and Weakness of Fedora/RHEL OS management)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Le mardi 04 avril 2006 à 21:31 +0200, Nicolas Mailhot a écrit :
> Le mardi 04 avril 2006 à 15:19 -0400, seth vidal a écrit :
> > On Tue, 2006-04-04 at 21:09 +0200, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> > > (why do you think
> > > Red Hat revived Fedora after letting it wither a few years)
> > 
> > umm. what? When did red hat let fedora wither?
> 
> deemphasised if you want to be politically correct (RHL 8 to FC-2 or 3 I
> think) Then the press releases started rolling again and Fedora was not
> the ugly duckling anymore.

Which makes me think (slow thinker that I am) now that this period is
over could we add a Fedora History page in the wiki with the "eat your
brainz" satire ?

Or is it still too early ?

-- 
Nicolas Mailhot

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux