On Wed, 2006-03-29 at 13:10 -0800, Jesse Keating wrote: > On Wed, 2006-03-29 at 22:30 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: > > I was talking about fluendo, so this tool would help users to download > > legitimate plugins, I also suggested that maybe we could convince real > > to make real codecs available for such a semi automated install, so > > there is no infringement here. Please read my post again, and next time > > read before shooting a default answer from the hip. > > From what I gather, our Legal team did not see it as possible to even do > this, if we had wanted to. We don't WANT to encourage the use of these > non-free codecs. > While I don't think Fedora should be providing any *nudge, nudge, wink, wink* "semi-automated" mechanisms for installing non-free codecs, what are the possibilities/ramifications of including a mention of the fluendo mp3 codec in either the release notes or the forbidden items FAQ? I rip all my CDs in ogg, and even bought an iriver player to use them, but taking the stance that by choosing Fedora I should lock up all of the mp3s I bought from emusic.com seems a bit extreme. > -- > fedora-devel-list mailing list > fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
