Dnia 29-03-2006, śro o godzinie 13:10 -0800, Jesse Keating napisał(a): > We don't WANT to encourage the use of these non-free codecs. Allowing MP3 != encouraging MP3. Forcing Ogg Vorbis != encouraging Ogg Vorbis. I don't speak english very well, so please tell me, can one encourage anything when there's no other choice? Remember we're only speaking about pointing users at Fluendo, which is legal. And, as I don't own any MP3 player myself, will stick to Ogg Vorbis for my music, so don't think I'm against you or Fedora or "free" or anything. Also remember MP3 is the "free" standard of the future - by 2010 it becomes public domain, so there'll be no "proprietary" argument involved. Right now, if someone already paid Thomson their fee, the best thing to do is using it as much as we can, to make the their per-user income lesser :) I know, it's stupid :) Lam
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: To jest =?iso-8859-2?Q?cz=EA=B6=E6?= listu podpisana cyfrowo
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
