Re: Fedora's way forward

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Have Redhat lawyers approached Fraunhofer about this? I can't see any
financial down side for them -- it would be another licence sale.

On 3/28/06, Eric S. Raymond <esr@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Andy Burns <fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> > Eric S. Raymond wrote:
> >
> > >The page says $50K one time flat fee for a decoder.
> >
> > And an £15K minimum annual royalty?
>
> I don't see that.
>
> >                      Presumably they won't allow  source
> > distribution, Fedora/RedHat might just as well point people to Fluendo's
> > paid up binary only MP3 plugin https://shop.fluendo.com/
>
> No, there's a crucial distinction.  Consumers think they should get this
> capability bundled with their OS, not have to pay extra after the sale.
> --
>                 <a href="http://www.catb.org/~esr/";>Eric S. Raymond</a>
>
> --
> fedora-devel-list mailing list
> fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
>

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux