Le lundi 27 mars 2006 à 12:23 -0500, Andrew Overholt a écrit : > * Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot@xxxxxxxxxxx> [2006-03-25 05:12]: > > On the client part it's a shockingly bad idea (and I include applets > > there). Googling will find you boatloads of apps that choose java for > > portability and still can not run on anything else than windows, because > > just deploying the right JVM on all the systems you may target is a > > major problem (and I'm not even counting the free stacks there). > > > > If it where that easy, we'd have the latest eclipse version in Fedora > > with all the major plugins instead of the current situation. > > Perhaps I'm missing context here, but I sense an implication that something > is wrong with "the current situation". Am I correct? The current situation is good but could be better. Lots of Eclipse stuff is not packaged right now (WTP...). Though it's no fault of the packagers, just that's there is a wide gap between writing and deploying sanely java code on the desktop. The Fedora java project is doing great stuff, given what they have as input. Regards, -- Nicolas Mailhot
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
