Le dimanche 12 mars 2006 à 23:10 +0000, David Woodhouse a écrit : > On Sun, 2006-03-12 at 18:34 +0100, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > > Why do you need a separate header/field/whatever ? > > You *already* have this field - that's the GPG signature. > > Assign weights to signing keys and you're done > > Not always sufficient. Most of the time I want yum to prioritise, it's > when it downloads a package from a remote repository which is actually > also available from a local one (with a file:// URL). I'd want to > priorities my local caches over the remote repositories, which can't be > done with the signature (although yum arguably ought to do that one for > itself anyway). The local/remote problem is 100% inside yum - can not be solved at the package level. One could even argue it should not be exposed at the user at all. -- Nicolas Mailhot
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
