Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
(Of course that would require Fedora to implement the long-awaited rawhide signing. Virtuous circle - you do something for one reason, and it has good side effects on other problems)
Rawhide signing should be done anyway IMO. I have never heard a valid argument not to do so. It provides a piece of mind that you have authentic packages for very little cost. -mf
-- Michael Favia michael.favia@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx Insites Incorporated http://michael.insitesinc.com -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
