> Did you not have obsoletes enabled? iiimf-libs at least should have > been removed by scim obsoleting old versions. Some packages being left Yep, that's strange, I have scim-libs installed, and that package obsoletes iiimf-libs. Something went wrong. Unfortunately I haven't redirected the yum errors :-( I have obsoletes enabled (this is the default, if I'm not wrong). > isn't abnormal on an upgrade. Yep, but won't these block later updates? For example gnome-kerberos requires a lot of libs. I understand that yum cannot deal with those packages, but maybe anaconda should? After more thinking, it is not obvious. Indeed it could be possible that I rebuild locally new versions of a package dropped from core and not obsoleted. So anaconda wouldn't be very nice if it removed it. Maybe the only thing to do should be to explicitely list such packages in the release notes. In the FC-4 release notes, there is a list of packages moved to extras, but no list of packages dropped from core and still not taken by extras. -- Pat -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
