Dnia 07-03-2006, wto o godzinie 10:57 -0500, Jeff Spaleta napisał(a): > On 3/6/06, Tomasz Kłoczko <kloczek@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > - many programs still uses /var/spool/mail, > > > > # LANG= grep /var/spool/mail /usr/bin/* /usr/sbin/* /sbin/* /bin/* > > Did you run the equilalent grep for /var/mail ? I think you should, > and then do a diff against both lists to get a more accurate picture > of potential compliance problems. # ( LANG= ; grep /var/mail /bin/* /usr/bin/* /usr/sbin/* /sbin/*; grep /var/spool/mail /bin/* /usr/bin/* /usr/sbin/* /sbin/* ) | sort | uniq -d Binary file /usr/bin/balsa-ab matches Binary file /usr/bin/balsa matches Binary file /usr/bin/epic-EPIC4-2.2 matches Binary file /usr/bin/epic matches Binary file /usr/bin/gkrellm matches Binary file /usr/bin/incm matches So in this kind buggy programs we have some additional subclass :> > balsa for example... matches for both /var/mail and /var/spool/mail > I don't see how you can make a judgement about uncompliant behavior > based on grep matches for binaries which match both /var/mail and > /var/spool/mail. There is nothing in the fhs which says that an > application can't look for other directories as well as /var/mail. Don't try look on stupid examples ;> Try answer on some very basig/elementar questio like: if some programs uses only one location (with full success) why some other tries be "more smarter" ? :) kloczek -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
