On Sat, 2006-03-04 at 14:14 -0500, Chris Tyler wrote: > Should we consider bind-chroot obsolete, since SElinux should be able > to provide similar protection (preventing named from touching files it > should not, even if compromised)? Most definitely not. Chroot is simple and effective; I've still never been able to install and use SElinux without it breaking things. -- dwmw2 -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
