2006/2/22, Tom Brinkman <tbrinkman@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > On Wednesday 22 February 2006 08:57, Joachim Frieben wrote: > > Yes, for the "nv" driver, you do not obtain any hardware > > acceleration at all. > > Not quite true, an hasn't been for several years. What you don't > have with 'nv' is direct rendering (DRI). Needed for 3d/accel games. > Prior to SGI's contributions a few years ago, 'glxgears' wouldn't > even run at all. > (from glxinfo) > display: :0 screen: 0 > direct rendering: No > server glx vendor string: SGI > server glx version string: 1.2 > > > So, the values are still reasonable for pure > > soft rendering and equivalent for my own older hardware with "DRI" > > enabled! > > > > > I get 160/170 on nvidia [Quadro4 NVS AGP 8x]. Standard "nv" > > > driver, no nvidia driver. > > GeF4, nv driver, Athlon XP 3200+/400.. 380 / 390fps on the small > default window, but when run full screen, 1280x1024-24 it drops to > 27 / 30fps. > > -- > Tom Brinkman Corpus Christi, Texas > > -- umm care to elaborate what is hardware accelerated by the gpu with software rendering and the nv driver if the cpu does all the rendering? regards, Rudolf Kastl > fedora-devel-list mailing list > fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list > -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
