Ivan Gyurdiev wrote: >Anyway, the fact that it's a tiny subset of applications doesn't mean >that it wouldn't be helpful to get developer review of the policy, and >participation/patches. Quite so. But my concern isn't with the few developers working on critical infrastructure: by all means have them learn about SELinux and review policy. However, I don't think it's reasonable to expect application developers /in general/ to be responsible for making their applications work in the presence of SELinux, any more than one could expect corporate admins /in general/ to have a detailed understanding of SELinux policy. Ron -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
