Arjan van de Ven wrote:
On Thu, 2006-02-23 at 09:16 -0500, Ivan Gyurdiev wrote:
And how is anybody here going to be able to debug or even only guess
what is wrong when using a kernel like that ?
Well, I would assume, by having a better idea about how memory
allocations work, and how they can be tracked, people could hint me as
to how to figure out what's eating all the memory (since the top command
isn't helping). Maybe three's a command I don't know about, or /proc
statistics that could explain what's happening. If I knew how to debug
the problem I wouldn't be asking the question, would I?
I guess I should cc Steve Grubb on this, since the kernel does include
lspp patches.
also ask nvidia and madwifi for help first I suppose ;)
Sure he's got these infamous modules. But he's not asking for someone to
solve his problem but for information on how he could do it. Or does it
mean that, just because he took the risk to use these modules, he should
be denied the information he seeks. So please, would anyone be so kind
as to explain how to track such leaks. I, for one, would be interested
in knowing how to track them too. After three days, I get this:
3037932 3036704 99% 0.04K 33021 92 132084K biovec-1
3037920 3036816 99% 0.12K 101264 30 405056K bio
I guess my sin is to have LVM on the top of MD RAID1.
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list