On Mon, 2006-02-13 at 09:35 -0500, Chuck Anderson wrote: > On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 03:03:48PM +1300, Michael J Knox wrote: > > The suggestion is to point to a set of "real" kernel includes instead of > > RH's glibc-kernheaders package. > > Kernel includes should never be used from userspace. > > > Has anyone got some suggestions on what should be done about this or how > > to work around it (from a packaging standpoint) ? > > If the glibc-kernheaders are insufficient, and snort is sticking to > documented public interfaces, then glibc-kernheaders should be fixed > to define those interfaces. > Ok, so do I go back to snort and find out whats what or does RH update glibc-kernheaders? Michael -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
