On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 03:03:48PM +1300, Michael J Knox wrote: > The suggestion is to point to a set of "real" kernel includes instead of > RH's glibc-kernheaders package. Kernel includes should never be used from userspace. > Has anyone got some suggestions on what should be done about this or how > to work around it (from a packaging standpoint) ? If the glibc-kernheaders are insufficient, and snort is sticking to documented public interfaces, then glibc-kernheaders should be fixed to define those interfaces. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
