On Thu, 2006-02-09 at 01:30 +0100, Jos Vos wrote: > On Wed, Feb 08, 2006 at 07:24:49PM -0500, Jeremy Katz wrote: > > > On Thu, 2006-02-09 at 01:20 +0100, Jos Vos wrote: > > > > Unless you use a glibc compiled with "-mno-tls-direct-seg-refs" > > > (added to BuildFlags in the glibc spec file), recommended, AFAIK. > > > B.t.w., what are the drawbacks of this? > > > > You lose decent threading (NPTL). Also, you can't do this with fc5 as > > But not with the "-mno-tls-...", right? I was asking for the drawbacks > of using glibc compiled with this flag: so, why is glibc only generated > that way for use with Xen? ISTR there being a performance difference Jeremy -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
