On Mon, 2006-02-06 at 16:05 -0500, Mike A. Harris wrote: > usage internally by individuals, and our next generation buildsystem > is aparently based on mock/plague. What more exactly are you looking Technically just mock. There are some specific architectural differences, not to mention different target audiences, for the nextgen internal stuff versus plague. For example, plague is meant to be distributed so that the builders and server don't have to be run by the same organization. This means that RPMs and SRPMs are transferred with HTTP, because you can't rely on fast local shared storage. In a centralized buildsystem model, that's just nuts because you'll almost always have fast centralized storage. The user model is also quite simplistic, while in an enterprise you'd usually hook this stuff up to a directory or other authentication means. Plague isn't meant as an enterprise build system, though it could be expanded to fill that role. If it did, it would end up like Bugzilla; way to complicated to install over a weekend, and completely in need of a babysitter 6 out of 7 nights a week. Dan -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
