On Mon, 2006-02-06 at 09:12 -0800, Jesse Keating wrote: > On Mon, 2006-02-06 at 09:03 -0800, Steve G wrote: > > > > Out of curiosity, when the rebuild occurs...does the script use an alphabetical > > listing of the packages from a to z. Or does the script try to build the packages > > in a somewhat ordered fashion from no dependencies (attr, zlib, bzip, etc) to > > more complicated packages that have many dependencies (mkinitrd, pam, slang, > > etc.) > > Mostly just an a to z thing. The way our current build system works, > every package is installed into the build root, so at this point we're > pretty assured that all build reqs will be met. This is not optimal for > many reasons, and a replacement build system is being developed that > fixes this. I know that yum/mock/plague doesn't quite fit the bill as a beehive replacement, but it would be nice if RedHat could work with the community to extend yum/mock/plague rather than re-inventing the wheel. I know that one thing that plague could use is a way to easily switch the plague client between two or more plague servers. Jeff
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list