Lamont R. Peterson wrote: > On Saturday 04 February 2006 01:06pm, Mike A. Harris wrote: >>Lamont R. Peterson wrote: >>I think our 6 month cycle plan remains, but will likely vary depending >>on various factors. I'd like to see it be a 9 month cycle that can >>vary earlier or later though, but that's just my personal opinion. I >>dunno who else would agree with me on that. ;) > Now that you mention it, I like it. I would support the idea. I like it too. Which means 1 or 2 releases a year. Seems enough time to make a stable release. -- Igor Jagec -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list