On Saturday 04 February 2006 04:19am, Igor Jagec wrote: > Jesse Keating wrote: [snip] Enough with the birthdays already. :) How about if we slip FC5 just a little more so that it is released in May on FC4's 1st anniversary? That would give us enough time to make a test4 and maybe even a test5 release to iron out all the new X bugs. hehe, just kidding. > > during that time to make sure FC5 is a great release for YOUR birthday > > (; > > It's gonna be a great release. It's been a long time since FC4 was > released... I suppose that RHEL5 will be based on FC5 since it took as > much time to build it. Maybe it is a good idea to make release cycle to > one year instead of 4 to 6 months as it is said it's going to be for > Fedora Core. After 2-1/2 years, I think Fedora development has all but proved that 6 months is the minimum time between good distribution releases. It doesn't look like we're ever going to see 4 months. I'm not saying that 4 months isn't possible, just that the track record seems to show that 6 months is the "right" timeframe. I'm not saying that 4 months is a bad goal. On the contrary, I think setting tough goals is (usually) a good thing; it spurs us all on to accomplish things we never have before. -- Lamont R. Peterson <lamont@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Senior Instructor Guru Labs, L.C. [ http://www.GuruLabs.com/ ] GPG Key fingerprint: F98C E31A 5C4C 834A BCAB 8CB3 F980 6C97 DC0D D409
Attachment:
pgpHI0BQbx7gz.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
