Re: Removing Evolution on Rawhide

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 1/21/06, Igor Jagec <igorm5@xxxxxx> wrote:
> Well, if it's not possible to have Beagle without Evolution than I'll
> have it installed.

How about you track down exactly why the "evolution-sharp" requires
"evolution" instead of just requiring "evolution-data-server."

The cuplrit is evolution-sharp's dependancy on libeshell.so.0 which is
part of the evolution package.  The deep question here is can
libeshell.so.0 be put into a subpackage so that the evolution
application doesn't get pulled in when other applications need this
specific library.
This might even be a question for gnome upstream.. libeshell.so.0 may
need to be moved over as part of evolution-data-server instead of
being a part of evolution.

It's not even really the fedora packager's fault... this dep was
picked up by rpmbuild's automatic library dependancy mechanisms.

-jef

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux