On 01/21/2006 07:45:49 AM, David Nielsen wrote:
fre, 20 01 2006 kl. 22:39 -0500, skrev Willem Riede:
> And that begs the question "why?". Leveraging a library is one thing,
but > forcing in the application against users wishes is just wrong.
Fedora can force Beagle on me anytime they want - seriously why are you
people complaining about this, it's a simple case of weighting in the
net benefits of bringing in a new dependency vs. the pain for a relative
few users who'll want to remove a core application like evolution.
I happen not to use evolution for email - everybody should be able to make
their own choice - so I don't want evolution in my menus or popping up to
create a mail when such is initiated from any context.
(But I do like the promise of Beagle, I wasn't complaining about it, just
about what is trying to sneak in behind it)
I don't mind at all that (library) code is reused - that makes sense.
Do we need to start removing functionality
No, but I ask that everyone's freedom to choose is preserved.
why spend time mailing the list,
when a bugreport would be the correct answer.
Mailing this list is less effort than creating a bugzilla, and usually a good
sounding board whether such a report would stand a chance of getting worked.
Regards, and sorry if I offended anyone, Willem Riede.
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
