Ian Pilcher wrote:
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
You dont get it. The transition happens based on the subsequent releases
and are *not* based on N months time period of any sort. For example ff
we decide to having a development release cycle of one year for FC6, FC4
would get benefited from a longer release maintenance cycle from Fedora
Core developers.
So you're saying that Arjan's explanation of the reasons for the current
policy are wrong. If that's the case, what are the reasons?
Originally I believe test2 was just one of those convenient milestone
for transition into legacy. It was not originally a rigid policy. So
Arjan's description has been right. Now it seems we have settled down on
using it consistently. Unless something major pop's up thats probably
going to be true for subsequent releases too.
--
Rahul
Fedora Bug Triaging - http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
