Rahul Sundaram wrote: > You dont get it. The transition happens based on the subsequent releases > and are *not* based on N months time period of any sort. For example ff > we decide to having a development release cycle of one year for FC6, FC4 > would get benefited from a longer release maintenance cycle from Fedora > Core developers. So you're saying that Arjan's explanation of the reasons for the current policy are wrong. If that's the case, what are the reasons? -- ======================================================================== Ian Pilcher i.pilcher@xxxxxxxxxxx ======================================================================== -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
