On 1/18/06, Ralf Corsepius <rc040203@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Name make a differences. If RH simply provided the packages on the same > directories, on the same servers and would exchange the personell from > "RH to Legacy" underneath, probably nobody would notice. The goal should not be to make sure people do not notice. People need to notice that the release has gone EOL so they can make an informed choice as to how they want to proceed in case they failed to understand the EOL policy before they decided to install the release. I'm all for lowering the bar to make that transition as painless as possible, but users of the EOL status of the release need to be made aware of the status change somehow. Having legacy populate the same repository definitions makes it that much harder for admins to notice the status has changed. EOL has implications for admins beyond the Core updates provided by Legacy. -jef -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
