Rahul Sundaram wrote: > No. common misconception. Bugzilla is a generic tracking mechanism. See > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugsAndFeatureRequests Ok I will, thanks. >>Anyway, is there any sence if I propose rollback feature for >>Pirut? Or is it better to ask Seth Vidal and the Yum guys? Thanks. > Does rollback feature actually work you using up2date in Fedora? Yep, it works perfectly. I used it recently when kdelib was breaking k3b, and I rolled it back to older version of kdelibs with no problem. It's much more easier to write 'up2date --undo' nor " rpm -Uvh --rollback '1 hour ago' ", or something. Ok, I had problems with it on Rawhide when you updated Xorg to 7.0 when I couldn't startx and that was the only thing when rollback didn't make it. X are very complex packages thoe and I suppose that rollback feature wasn't designed for such things as rolling back to previous version of X or kernel. Anyway, rpm itself does not provide such informations as it follows: [root@munja ~]# up2date --list-rollbacks install time: Tue Jan 17 03:35:30 2006 tid:1137465330 [-] alsa-lib-1.0.10-2.FC4: [-] alsa-lib-devel-1.0.10-2.FC4: [-] groff-1.18.1.1-5: [+] groff-1.18.1.1-6.FC4: [+] alsa-lib-devel-1.0.10-3.FC4: [+] alsa-lib-1.0.10-3.FC4: I usually don't keep those packages in /var/spool/repackage if I experience no problem in a day or two. Anyway, that rollback feature is a very nice thing. -- Igor Jagec -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
