Re: rawhide stability

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>I've been fighting a loosing battle to get policy in shape for my system
>before FC5.

We have a lot of SE Linux tasks in flight at the moment. Its not just the policy
that has major development going on. It may not seem like its getting more
stable, but this is because we are trying hard to get the whole SE Linux system
feature complete.

>It would be possible if rawhide was otherwise stable and the selinux
>maintainers focused on stabilization, but every time I identify a
>policy problem it's rendered moot either by other rawhide problems (no
>selinux testing time left) or selinux policy changes (new creative
>policies which add new problems on top of the existing ones)

We appreciate any bugs being reported and it does help us. SE Linux changes will
slow down soon, but in the meantime there may be some problems here and there.
Please continue testing and giving us feedback on fedora-selinux. We do
appreciate the testing.

Thanks,
-Steve

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux