On Mon, 2006-01-16 at 12:13 -0500, Dave Jones wrote: > In practice, either the bugs will go unfixed, lowering the overall > reputation of Fedora, or they'll land in bugzilla against 'kernel' > where they'll also go unfixed, with the added bonus of driving me crazy > as I try to make sense of problems that make no sense against a Fedora kernel. > > We can add all the disclaimers and policies we want, users won't care > (because typically, they don't read them, they read some HOWTO > that tells them to 'yum install kernel-suspend2' or the like). > > They downloaded something from Fedora, they want Fedora to fix it when it breaks. > If we're not setup to do that, we shouldn't do it. > I am in deep agreement here. I don't see these kernels in extras as being anything other than a bad thing. -- Jesse Keating RHCE (geek.j2solutions.net) Fedora Legacy Team (www.fedoralegacy.org) GPG Public Key (geek.j2solutions.net/jkeating.j2solutions.pub)
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
