Re: suspend/hibernate on desktops

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



În data de Lu, 16-01-2006 la 09:41 +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis a scris:
> > I agree in general but if the community wants to maintain such kernels 
> > why should we stop them?.
> 
> In the swsusp2 case: Because it takes away testers and users aways from
> our core kernels (and the work that is done by upstream, too). And we
> want a swsusp to work there out of the box in the longer term.

<suspend2 spoiled user>

That's the reason I use suspend2: it works (mostly, if you don't include
patching the kernel) out of the box, not depending on the phase of the
moon thank you verry much.

I preffer a working solution to a constantly-shifting one.

</rant>

-- 
Cioby



-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux