Really delighted to see the new compat-libstdc++ today, but getting the following attempting to yum them down: ============================================================================= Install 0 Package(s) Update 2 Package(s) Remove 0 Package(s) Total download size: 405 k Downloading Packages: (1/2): compat-libstdc++-2 100% |=========================| 174 kB 00:00 http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/core/development/i386/Fedora/RPMS/compat-libstdc%2B%2B-296-2.96-134.i386.rpm: [Errno -1] Package does not match checksum Trying other mirror. (2/2): compat-libstdc++-3 100% |=========================| 230 kB 00:00 http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/core/development/i386/Fedora/RPMS/compat-libstdc%2B%2B-33-3.2.3-54.fc5.i386.rpm: [Errno -1] Package does not match checksum Trying other mirror. Error Downloading Packages: compat-libstdc++-33 - 3.2.3-54.fc5.i386: failure: Fedora/RPMS/compat-libstdc++-33-3.2.3-54.fc5.i386.rpm from development: [Errno 256] No more mirrors to try. compat-libstdc++-296 - 2.96-134.i386: failure: Fedora/RPMS/compat-libstdc++-296-2.96-134.i386.rpm from development: [Errno 256] No more mirrors to try. Peter Robinson writes: > > > > > As you'll notice, there will be lots more packages bumped for the rebase > > > > > to gcc. Most completed today, but we'll be working through a list of > > > > > failures over the next couple days. Things will still be in a bit of > > > > > flux, but we're working on it. > > > > > > > > > > Java is still being worked on too. Getting the java stack built with > > > > > gcj is a great accomplishment and I really respect our java and gcj team > > > > > for putting in the work to further the free java. Please bare with us > > > > > as we finalize the development changes necessary to accomplish this > > > > > task. > > > > > > > > Does the new GCC introduce any run-time/ABI breakage which requires > > > > packages in Fedora Extras Development to be rebuilt? Or does it only > > > > reveal problematic source code? > > > > > > I think all the extras need to be rebuilt for this. I know seahorse > > > for one needs it (and may need some fixes). > > > > AFAIK, seahorse was affected by SONAME changes in some of its > > dependencies, which made a rebuild necessary. That was a change not > > related to the GCC upgrade. My question is not about ordinary breakage > > through upgrades of dependencies. > > Yes, I think that's true but I also think there is some gcc41 rebuild > issues with it too (well there seems to be when I just try to rebuild > the srpm. I think the binaries produced by gcc 4 and 4.1 are > compatible so most things won't need to be rebuilt, but then its > probably good for them to be rebuilt too. > > Pete > > -- > fedora-devel-list mailing list > fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list -- Janina Sajka Phone: +1.240.715.1272 Partner, Capital Accessibility LLC http://www.CapitalAccessibility.Com Marketing the Owasys 22C talking screenless cell phone in the U.S. and Canada--Go to http://www.ScreenlessPhone.Com to learn more. Chair, Accessibility Workgroup Free Standards Group (FSG) janina@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://a11y.org -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
