On Mon, 9 Jan 2006 11:38:28 +0000, Peter Robinson wrote: > On 1/9/06, Michael Schwendt wrote: > > On Sat, 17 Dec 2005 23:43:16 -0800, Jesse Keating wrote: > > > > > As you'll notice, there will be lots more packages bumped for the rebase > > > to gcc. Most completed today, but we'll be working through a list of > > > failures over the next couple days. Things will still be in a bit of > > > flux, but we're working on it. > > > > > > Java is still being worked on too. Getting the java stack built with > > > gcj is a great accomplishment and I really respect our java and gcj team > > > for putting in the work to further the free java. Please bare with us > > > as we finalize the development changes necessary to accomplish this > > > task. > > > > Does the new GCC introduce any run-time/ABI breakage which requires > > packages in Fedora Extras Development to be rebuilt? Or does it only > > reveal problematic source code? > > I think all the extras need to be rebuilt for this. I know seahorse > for one needs it (and may need some fixes). AFAIK, seahorse was affected by SONAME changes in some of its dependencies, which made a rebuild necessary. That was a change not related to the GCC upgrade. My question is not about ordinary breakage through upgrades of dependencies. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
